The study of used socio-scientific issues (SSI) in Biology (IR)

Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	Q Science (General)
ISSN :	2222-6990
Main Author :	Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad
Additional Authors :	Sadiah Baharom Siti Eshah Mokshien Mohd Afifi Bahurudin Setambah
Title :	The study of used socio-scientific issues (SSI) in Biology (IR)

Place of Production :	HRMARS
Year of Publication :	2017
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Abstract :

Using socio-scientific issues (SSI) in science lesson especially biology is an approach for students to understand and empower the science concept. Students are given the opportunity to argue the issues and will improve the process of reasoning. Using this approach indirectly can create awareness of ethics and problem solving to students. From the literature review hopefully can develop reasoning skills model based on SSI. Structural Equation Model (SEM) approach is used for measure and identify the variables that contribute students’ reasoning skills. From trends of literature reviews, three independents variables were identified, Content Acquisition, Epistemology Science Belief, Adhered values and ethics towards Reasoning Skills as a dependent variable. Hoped this study will help to improve the empowering of science concepts and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). In another hand, it also can produce a holistic students and increase creative and critical thinking skill while using the model of reasoning as a guideline.

References

1. Acar, O., Turkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student Difficulties in Socio‐scientific Argumentation and Decision‐making Research Findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902991805 2. Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific Issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2 3. Böttcher, F., & Meisert, A. (2013). Effects of Direct and Indirect Instruction on Fostering Decision-Making Competence in Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9271-0 4. Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S.-W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Enhancing Students’ Communication Skills in the Science Classroom Through Socioscientific Issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9557-6 5. Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. ., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006901750162892 6. Husin, A., Hamidah Abd Hamid, & Siti Hajar Abdul. (2006). Media baru dan Wacana Sains: Isu Pengklonan melalui Blog dan Akhbar di Malaysia. Kajian Malaysia, XXIV(2), 97–128. 7. Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science Teachers’ Use of Mass Media to Address Socio-Scientific and Sustainability Issues. Research in Science Education, 42, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z 8. Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science Teachers’ Use of Mass Media to Address Socio-Scientific and Sustainability Issues. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 51– 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z 9. Lewis, J., & Leach, J. (2006). Discussion of Socio‐scientific Issues: The role of science knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500439348 10. Mueller, M. P., & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral – Ethical Character and Science Education : EcoJustice Ethics Through Socioscientific Issues ( SSI ). In D.J Tippins et. al. (Ed.), Cultural Studies & Environmentalism (Vol. 3, pp. 105–128). © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3929-3 11. Pegg, J. M. (2006). Developing explanations: student reasoning about science concepts during claims-evidence inquiry lessons. Interpreting. Retrieved from http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/3190 12. Reis, P. (2009). Teaching Controversial Socio-Scientific Issues in Biology and Geology Classes : A Case Study. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13, 1–24. 13. Reiss, M. J. (2006). Teacher Education and the New Biology Teacher Education and the New Biology. Teaching Education, (April 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210600680325 14. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33, 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000733091 15. Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. a. (2006). Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717 16. Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023 17. Sampson, V., Simon, S., Amos, R., & Evagorou, M. (2011). Metalogue: Engaging Students in Scientific and Socio-scientific Argumentation BT - Socio-scientific Issues in …. In Socioscientific Issues in … (pp. 193–200). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4 18. Siew Fong Yap. (2014). Beliefs, values, ethics and moral reasoning in socio-scientific education. Issues in Educational Research, 24(3), 2014, 24(24(3)), 21. 19. Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 615–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9 20. Yoon, S. (2008). Using memes and memetic processes to explain social and conceptual influences on student understanding about complex socio-scientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 900–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20256 21. Zeidler, D. L., Florida, S., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific Issues : Theory and Practice, 21(2), 49–58. 22. Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific Issues in Science Education. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education, 7–38 TS–CrossRef. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_2 M4 - Citavi 23. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281 24. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A researchbased framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048 25. Zeidler, M. D., Ph, D., Howes, E., Ph, D., Ferron, J., Ph, D., … Ph, D. (2009). College Students ‟ Use of Science Content During Socioscientific Issues Negotiation : Impact of Evolution Understanding and Acceptance by Samantha R . Fowler A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of P.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page